For aerospace and regulated manufacturing teams

Aerospace quality, connected in one operating loop.

A failed inspection should not send your team hunting through spreadsheets, emails, folders, and disconnected QMS records. ARQEN keeps the requirement, decision, owner, and evidence together from the first signal through closure.

It helps people see what needs attention and why. The people responsible for quality still decide what gets approved, dispositioned, released, or closed.

Human authority; machine assistance. Disposition, approval, effectiveness, closure, and release remain explicit human decisions.

Current seeded demoMy Work · the operator's starting point
ARQEN My Work showing accountable quality work and exact source context

This queue does not make the decision. It shows the operator which source record needs attention and where the decision belongs.

How My Work works →

Where the work usually breaks

One dimensional failure. Five teams that need the same story.

The expensive part is rarely creating another record. It is preserving enough context for the next person to act without starting the investigation again.

  1. 01Inspection

    A result misses tolerance.

    The drawing revision, characteristic, measured result, part, lot, and inspector stay together.

  2. 02Quality

    The right material goes on hold.

    The NCR starts from the failed result instead of asking someone to rebuild the context.

  3. 03MRB

    A person makes the disposition.

    Affected product, evidence, authority, and rationale remain visible at the decision point.

  4. 04CAPA

    Corrective action carries the same source.

    Cause, implementation, and effectiveness do not become a disconnected project or email thread.

  5. 05Leadership

    The story reaches review intact.

    Leaders can inspect what happened, what changed, who owns the follow-up, and what still needs proof.

ARQEN NCR workspace showing containment and source-linked quality context
Current seeded demo · NCR workspace with sample records

Reading the screen

The dashboard is not the point. What remains attached to the decision is.

A

Start with the source

The NCR keeps the originating inspection and affected-product context in view.

B

Show who decides

Containment and disposition stay with named, responsible people—not an automated status change.

C

Keep the next handoff visible

If corrective action is needed, the downstream work carries the same source identity forward.

Follow the complete quality event →

“Software should make a quality decision easier to inspect—not make the decision for you.”

ARQEN product principle

Across the quality system

Different work. One continuous record of why.

Each team keeps its own responsibilities. ARQEN keeps the handoffs from erasing the context between them.

01

Product quality

A failed characteristic carries its drawing, revision, part, lot, result, evidence, and affected-product context into NCR and CAPA work.

Follow the product-quality thread →
02

Supplier quality

A supplier escape keeps the supplier, receipt, product, containment, response, and verification visible as one recovery story.

Explore supplier quality →
03

Management review

Leaders inspect the records behind risk and recurrence, make a decision, assign accountable work, and follow it through closure.

See leadership review →

Start with the handoff your team already knows is painful.

Bring one inspection, NCR, CAPA, or review process. We will map where the story gets lost.

Walk through your process